A place where I organise the chaos of my mind

Author: David Alade (Page 1 of 16)

I am a student of the world. I learn, build and share.

The Right Tool for the Job: My Rationale for a Masters in Finance

June 2025, in Round 5 of 6 application rounds at London Business School, I was offered admission into the prestigious Masters in Finance (MiF) program.

August 2025, I started the program. It will take me two years to complete as I am studying part-time.

From thinking about attending LBS, to submitting my application, going through the interview process, receiving the admission decision, and then being awarded a merit scholarship — I’ve been the happiest. I’ve looked forward to going back to school for many years, and I couldn’t be more proud to be attending the best business school in Europe and the best MiF program in the world.

Right now, it’s like “elẹ́ gùn ẹṣin nínú mi”¹ — that’s exactly how I feel.

I’m writing this article not to reminisce about how I feel, but to answer a critical question: why I decided to attend a Masters in Finance programme and not an MBA.

You see over the last ten years, I’ve dreamt of doing an MBA programme, and within my professional circle over the last seven years, there has probably been no more recurring conversation than, “When are you going for your MBA?” It’s been a common topic among my peers; many of whom have already pursued one, with many more planning to do so.

At the same time, recommending an MBA has been my top advice to people over the last couple of years because it simply makes sense — for the goal they wanted to pursue.

Personally, it’s the topic on which I have sought the most advice from senior colleagues: “Would you recommend an MBA?”, “What’s your take on the ROI?”, “How can one get into the best MBA programmes?” — and many more questions like that.

As a result of the above points, I believe it is worth sharing my thought process around that decision. First, with those I’ve been discussing this with over the years, and secondly, with others who might be at a crossroads and could use someone else’s compass to navigate their path. 

My thoughts process 

Until a few years ago when I moved to the UK, I’d never imagined a life in the UK and as a result was not acquainted with its economy or the labour-levers of the economy. By labour-levers, I mean what gets rewarded vs not vs indifference in a given labour market. On the other hand, I am aware of this for the US — as much as one could from the corners of Ilorin, Kwara state or Ketu, Lagos state. For the US, I knew that getting an MBA from a M7 or T20 school increases your surface area of opportunity — including in a wide variety of industries. So my preference for MBA was largely driven by the US lens. 

After moving to the UK, I still remained pro-MBA as the best option for anyone interested in switching careers (top reason why people do MBA) or interested in the business of businesses (another top reason). A critical turning point came when I decided that, in the foreseeable future, I’d like to remain in the UK rather than move to another country — the US. As a result of that decision, I focused my eyes on the UK and started paying attention to what the labour-levers are and which levers would help me achieve my goals of wanting and investing in higher education. 

So what are my goals?

  1. I wanted a career in the asset management industry. What specifically that should be, I don’t know. So I hoped, first, that the programme I opted for would help me figure that out and be instrumental in helping me enter the industry.
  2. I wanted something very technical—again, with the aim of serving my first goal. By very technical, I meant something that would give me a deep foundation in finance, broad enough to cover a wide range of areas but with enough rigour to support my ambition in asset management.
  3. I wanted a programme that limits my optionality to exactly what I outlined in point one as my primary goal. I wanted to optimise for focus, not broad choices. 
  4. I wanted a programme that would immerse me in the London asset management ecosystem. By this, I mean one that offers opportunities to learn from what others are doing, to connect with them, and to share in a sense of professional camaraderie.
  5. I wanted time flexibility—a priority I only recognised later, but one that became important to include. By this, I mean having the space to fully digest the four points above without the added pressure of immediately securing a new job or financing the program. Being already based in London, the city of my program, gives me a natural advantage in easing that pressure.

With such clear goals, I did a deep dive into the employment report of the best MBA program in the UK. And the next few paragraphs explained what I found. 

Typical MBA Outcome — in the UK 

Using LBS class of 2024 as a case study.

There were 504 admits, of which 482 sought employment after completing their programme. What was their professional background, and where did they find employment post-MBA?

The broad split shows an increase in the percentage of those who took up positions in the consulting industry—42%, compared with 26% who had a consultancy background—a near 80% increase. Meanwhile, those who took up positions in the financial services sector showed a slight drop from 27% to 26%. The broad split obviously hides a nuance, which is those who moved sectors. So I took a closer look at consultants who switched to finance.

About 75% of those with a consulting background went back into consulting. Of the remainder, a few ended up in finance and the rest elsewhere. This category was important for me because if I had been in this cohort, I would have been categorised under consulting, considering my pre-MBA experience was predominantly at PwC and EY. One could estimate that less than 20% of this cohort of graduates took up opportunities in finance.

The next group in this analysis is those who eventually ended up in finance. A quick look at the above graph shows that the 27% with a finance background make up more than 50% of the 26% who ended up in finance post-MBA. As what matters most to me is this section, it was worth taking a deeper look. So I examined the 26% in greater detail to understand what it meant.

Finance sector breakdown 

By my definition of asset management—which includes private equity (PE), investment banking (IB), and investment management (IM)—only 18% of graduates had a post-MBA outcome in that industry. If I exclude PE, given how selective it is and the extent to which pre-MBA finance background (which I don’t have) plays a significant role, we’re looking at just 10%—about 48 individuals out of the 482 who sought formal employment after the MBA.

There’s also the question of employment density, and the next set of data helps illustrate that. But before getting into the numbers, it’s worth explaining why I believe density matters in the context of MBA outcomes.

Employment density indicates how concentrated hiring is within a particular industry or by specific employers from a given MBA programme. A high density suggests that employers view the programme as a reliable and strategic pipeline for talent—one they return to consistently and from which they source a large part of their associates. It reflects alignment between the curriculum, the network, and what the industry values (this is the most important for me, does the industry that I am interested in value it?). On the other hand, a low density might indicate a weaker connection between the programme and/or that industry—possibly due to limited exposure, weaker alumni presence, or insufficient technical alignment. 

For the Class of 2024, Morgan Stanley was the top employer in the Finance sector and it recruited only 4 students. The next two top recruiters, BII and PIMCO, employed 3 each and remaining top employers employed between two and one candidate of the total ~125 (26% of 482).

What are you thinking?

Looking at the data I have presented so far, do you think MBA is best placed to help me achieve my stated goals for wanting a higher education? I hope the data was sufficient to convince you, as it did me, that the answer is no, it is not sufficient and that I needed to look somewhere else.

Also, I hope you do not take out of that a notion that the MBA program isn’t great, because it is — considering the MBA outcome. It is only that I do not believe it helps achieve my goal. For further research on LBS outcome, see the employment report

Now, before I go into similar number-crunching for the MiF, let me share three anecdotes that factored into my decision.

1. Conversation with Corporate Finance Colleagues at EY and the response (spoken and unspoken) to that.

When MBA was still the top choice for me, I spoke to a colleague in the Corporate Finance team to understand what day to day looked like for him. During the conversation I mentioned that I was going to pursue an MBA for the pivot. He was startled, taken aback and paused for a moment. Then he said “that’s not a thing within the team.” He continued and said “if any education was relevant that he was aware of, it would be CFA. CFA is what we all are doing or planning on doing,” he added. During this conversation, I could also hear what he wasn’t saying out loud, “a MBA won’t give you an advantage here”. Truth is that I also left the call wondering why no one is doing MBA in all the corners that I turn to speak with those in my target area. 

2. Random tweet on my timeline. 

One day, while reflecting on the idea that you can’t just pursue an MBA for its own sake—or simply to fulfil a long-held dream that may no longer align with your immediate goals, especially given the significant investment of time and money—a random tweet popped up on my timeline. It struck a chord. 

The point became even more compelling when the author, whose views I respect, revealed that the person receiving this advice came from a public sector background. 

3. Encounter during job interviews. 

When I started interviewing for new opportunities in January of this year, I had another encounter. First of all, I noticed very few higher degrees among the leadership of the companies I was interviewing with. On the occasions that I did, MBAs grouped together did not dominate over other forms of master’s degrees, it was all quite random. But one interview convinced me further that the MiF could be a great option. I met an interviewer who had done the programme, occupied a position I see myself in in the future, and had great things to say about it, even many years later. He was also very kind, we spoke a bit about the MiF programme and I admired him. 

I’m not sure what anyone else reading these anecdotes would take from them, but I concluded that the MBA may not be right for me and that the MiF might be a better fit. Now, let’s take a look at the numbers behind the MiF as we did for the MBA. 

MiF Outcome 

All numbers from the MiF brochure points to an easy conclusion that MiF would be a better option towards achieving my goals.

  1. The class of 2023 (FT) had 141 students in its cohort. The following data is based on the outcome from this group but which can easily be used to estimate potential outcomes for the PT cohort as well since the curriculum is the same and similar resources are available to both. 
  2. 79% have a finance background and 10% have a background in Consulting.
  3. Only 4% with a background in Consulting (12%) returned to Consulting. (Note: these percentages are based on those who reported back to LBS on their post-graduation outcome.)
  4. 82% took up positions in the Finance sector post-program. Note that more than 90% of this cohort were international students and about 50% remained in the UK after graduation. 
  5. 82 companies recruited the graduates which equates to an average of about 2 graduates per employer. 
  6. Compared to the MBA where MBBs dominate the employer category, only McKinsey featured as an employer for MiF graduates. 
  7. The LBS MiF curriculum also shows a list of courses (core and electives) with potential to give sufficient technical depth. Actually I got an interesting anecdote to add to this. When I went for my interview for the programme, the interviewer, a portfolio manager and an alumnus, mentioned that a class he took on Insurance Accounting came handy at one of his deliverables that further convinced him of the value he was getting. 

In addition to the above, from the brochure, the concept of a sub-sector within Finance was also highlighted. As the image below shows, there are a number of these and while investment banking dominates, there are also many other sub-sectors where the graduates have gotten employment. 

Note: The PT program usually has about 40 in its cohort per year. All with existing presence in the UK and all mostly working in the Financial Services industry. 

Again, what are you thinking? 

I listed five expectations above for what I’m looking for in a programme I’m investing in. The data above shows that three of these—awareness of options, technical depth, and a limited number of options—are well covered if I choose the MiF. Clearly, the MiF helps me fulfil those criteria.

To paraphrase a classmate from the welcome event, referring to the broadness of the MBA program vs the limited scope of the MiF, she said, “I don’t want to do a course in Marketing; Finance is what I want.” That’s exactly how I feel. The MBA curriculum offers a broad range of topics that I don’t believe I need at this point. The MiF, on the other hand, has the focus I’m after—all courses are centred on Finance. Even the data analytics course is taught as Data Analytics for Finance, not for operations management or marketing optimisation. My cohort is also filled with people working across various sectors within the Finance industry—hedge funds, sovereign wealth funds, private equity, investment banking, and so on.

As for the remaining two goals—immersion in the London asset management industry and flexibility—these are achieved because I opted for the part-time option instead of full-time.

The full-time data shows that 99% of the class are international students, which means, at best, the industry insight I would gain would be based on their home countries. With part-time, however, everyone is already based in the UK and works in the industry here, even if they originally come from different countries, as I do.

And the flexibility is pretty clear—I’ll be spending two years on the programme instead of ten months. This means I don’t have to quit my current role and can hopefully apply some of what I learn immediately at work. 

That’s it!

This is really what I’ve spent the last couple of months thinking about, analysing data for, and ultimately deciding on.

To everyone I’ve reached out to on this topic and who generously shared their time and insights—thank you.

For those I’ve previously encouraged to pursue an MBA, I hope you can see that I’m not against doing one; it just doesn’t seem like the right fit for what I want to achieve right now.

And to anyone else reading this, I hope it serves as a useful data point to help you as you navigate similar questions in your own career.

¹ “Elẹ́ gùn ẹṣin nínú mi” is a Yoruba expression meaning “a rider has mounted a horse inside me.” It’s a vivid way of describing a powerful surge of emotion — in this case, overwhelming joy and fulfillment. 

Understanding labour-levers in the job market

Across different job markets and sectors, employers have a scale of preference regarding what they value from employees and/or what they consider good enough to take a chance on prospective employees. This phenomenon is what I call the labour-levers of a given market.

It is a labour-lever because having one or a combination of these factors gives you an edge in that market and sector.

Broadly, in most markets, these levers are education and experience. You are either educated enough to be trusted to do a thing or have done that thing before and are therefore trusted to do it again.

Nearly all markets value experience above other levers, but different markets have differing gaps in how they rate experience versus education.

In the UK, the gap between experience and education is one of the widest I’ve seen. Employers would choose someone with two years’ experience over someone with 10 years’ worth of education (BSc, MSc, and PhD). It may seem trivial as an observation, but its importance is much more pronounced for immigrants.

The path to immigration works in two ways: you have a job to come and do in the new country, or you decide to get an education in the new country first, hoping that the relevant education will ease your way into the country’s job market.

The gap highlighted implies that, in the UK, immigrants are often met with stark surprise about their expectations versus reality. They realise that even their experience from their home countries is more valuable than the education they have obtained in terms of opening doors to opportunities.

This has a few implications:

  1. Those who have obtained education with the hope of switching careers find it harder to do so.
  2. Frustration levels are elevated because you are being asked for experience in a new country where there is practically no way to get any.
  3. The value of the education that you have obtained is often diminished.
  4. It takes longer to realise the ROI on the education.
  5. It requires more effort than anticipated to eventually get the desired job.

In my reflection, I have also noticed that this gap between the value of experience and education varies depending on the type of education.

  1. When the education is highly specific to the UK, the gap shortens. For example, a foreign pharmacist who moves to the UK and completes the required education to become a UK‑qualified pharmacist faces a shorter gap and can easily get a job than an enterprise salesperson would, irrespective of the education they have obtained.
  2. Globally scarce skills that can be gained via education also shorten the gap. For example, an actuary.

Now, hopefully that helps someone to better navigate their way through things as they plan their career — in a new country.

Ask questions like:

  1. What are the labour-levers in the country’s job market?
  2. What are the labour-levers in my target sector?
  3. What’s the gap between these levers?
  4. Which lever(s) can I most optimise for?

Be relatable

Be relatable, be someone you would clap for.

Who do we clap for? It’s not the person who exerted the least effort and received the highest award. Nor is it the person who tried once and succeeded on the first attempt.

We clap for those who achieved the highest award after giving it their all. We clap for those who had to try a hundred times before finally getting that one win.

Why do we clap for the latter and not the former? Because one is relatable, and the other is not. We know the former is not the norm. In fact, we’re often quick to attribute their success to luck. The latter, on the other hand, represents a journey we’re not only familiar with, but one many of us are currently on. And so, we relate. We appreciate. We clap.

With that in mind, I challenge you to be relatable. Yes, you’ve had 80 failures—keep going, because that is exactly what’s normal. You’ve tried again and again and seen no deserved result—try once more, because that’s the process everyone who eventually wins must go through. Be someone you would clap for.

All-in: the winning mindset

Reflecting on the year 2025 has prompted me to write this post. And since it is unusual for me to write a themed message whose relevance and resonance ends with a year, I hope that the point of this post will last beyond January, certainly hope it lasts beyond 2025. Actually, my wish is that it stays relevant and resonating for longer than my blog could be available on the internet. With that said, I want to share about All-in now.

All-in is a mindset.

Here’s how it works: confronted with a piece of information, the mindset always prompts you to ask yourself, “If I followed everything to the letter as mentioned in this information, what would that look like for me?”

The information could be a new way of living, a new way to solve a problem you confront daily or a new way of doing something you didn’t know how to do before. It could also be a piece of information that you have read before without any attempt to practice it or you practised it halfheartedly. Whatever it is, the All-in mindset question remains intact; what would it look like if I just did it as this says?

Upfront, let me say while this mindset is an incredibly useful one, you will also find it as a great filter and as a result, realise only a few things are worth doing by being All-in.

Now, if you ask yourself the All-in question, and you eventually find a thing or two that you decided to go all in on, your life might just be about to make a total turnaround for greater heights, unparalleled progress and accelerated self-confidence.

Most of us, and that includes me, are readers of information only and rarely are we doers. Understandably so, in an age where we are overloaded and arguably overwhelmed by too much information. However, the only way to make marked progress in a definite time is to embrace the All-in mindset in as few or as many areas of your life as possible. Find a piece of useful information, go All-in and act on it. It could be about your health, career, relationship, faith, could be anything at any time, a combination of things, doesn’t matter.

Note that some All-in efforts are executable in a very short time frame while others can take a longer time. Some, as I have found with my commitment to the Christian faith, could even be for a lifetime.

Let me bring a few examples to further drive home the point.

In this article, on becoming a victim of exposure, I shared what that means and how it manifests. You could just start immediately after reading it and decide to start exposing yourself to as much information as the article suggests. And watch your life change overnight (or not). In any case, it would be clear you have gone All-in. Hopefully, you could also infer clearly from that last statement that All-in doesn’t guarantee success but only gives you a greater chance.

Another beautiful example is the idea of 100 rejections per year popularised on my Twitter TL by Imade. You could read that, toggle a like on it, as nearly 800 people did on the post, you may even bookmark it, also as nearly 700 people did on the post, all relishing the idea. Or you could decide not to even interact with the post at all (of course I am not encouraging this) but just go and get your 100 rejections and then watch your life transformed all in one year. That’s All-in. And its application is endless from a single sentence that feels right to All-in on for you, to a whole blog and from a simple conversation to a whole book

There is a strong resistance in us to just do things and to go All-in. Fight that resistance. Pick one thing, and then two and then three and more to go All-in on and watch your life take a new direction, not overnight, but it certainly will.

I hope that just like me, All-in becomes a daily mentality for you and not just a 2025 resolution. 

I also hope that you have the sense of urgency to determine what is worth going All-in on and the courage to go All-in on those from today, yes today not tomorrow. 

How To Find Fulfilment In Any Work – A Definitive Approach

As I reflect on the last two years of my career, I want to write about a topic that we all care about, seek an answer to, and still search for: a sense of fulfilment in our jobs.

The default thinking is to assume that you cannot have fulfilment unless you are working at a particular place, with a specific team, and on a type project. In our minds, we believe checking these boxes would mean a dream come true, and we can finally experience a sense of fulfilment. For the first four years of my career, I, too, was guilty of this line of thinking. I believed that I should be working in a specific place, on a specific project, and at a specific time, and that doing so would bring me the sense of fulfilment that I desperately needed. And I was right; it would give me (or not).

What would happen though, if, throughout my career, those conditions were never met? What happens if, in all the fifty plus years that I would be working, I never get to work on the kind of project I had envisioned as the perfect project to give me a sense of fulfilment? What if I could only tick two of the boxes at a time and not all of them simultaneously? These questions are crucial because, in reality, we don’t always get what we want or what we think we deserve. Or do you believe it is impossible? You think eventually, you will get what you want out of life that would provide you with fulfilment at work? Let me tell you a quick story.

Most of you, my readers, would be familiar with Clayton Christensen, the father of disruptive innovation. If you’re not, you can read about him here. His dream was to work with the New York Times, and throughout his career, he believed that although he wasn’t working there yet, the experiences he was gaining were preparing him to eventually land the job. So whenever he reached a crossroad in his career, he would think, “Yes, this is it, this is the time.” However, that time never came until the end of his career. “And that’s okay.” As Stewart Friedman noted in this favourite article of mine, “it’s okay” that Professor Clayton never got to work with the NYT.

I once had dreams of becoming like Bruce Springsteen. Now, at age 62, I write about him, go to his shows, sing along to his songs in my car, teach my children about his significance, use his works in my Wharton classes, and even serve as a Guest DJ on E Street Radio. But despite my earlier wishes to live a successful musical performer’s life, it’s not going to happen. I’m not Springsteen, and never will be. And that’s OK.

Stewart Friedman

So what did I learn? What can you do? And how can you find fulfilment even when you realise you’ll never get your dream job?

There are three things that I learnt have to all come together for one to find fulfilment. The right mindset, the necessary action and the important outlook.

  1. Mindset: 80:20 rule of boring and interestingness 
  2. Action: Total you @ Work
  3. Outlook: Don’t be a donkey – giving your best now as an accelerant for your next step 

Mindset – 80:20 rule of boring and interestingness

Let’s start by gaining an understanding of how the organisations we work in truly function.

All organisations exist because they add value to society in one way or another. Those that fail to do so are usually closed down, as that’s simply the way the world operates. Now, let’s concentrate on the value-adding ones. Adding value means they must excel in two areas. First, they need to bring order to the increasing chaos in their domain, and second, they need to simplify the complexities that surround their field. Understanding this is crucial, and I must admit it took me about five years to grasp this concept.

Organisations are in the business of bringing order to chaos and simplicity to complexities. If you’ve ever been involved in an explicit exercise where the task at hand is to restore order amidst chaos or simplify a complex phenomenon, you’ll agree with me that it is not always fun, nor is it entirely glamorous. Rather, such activities are a mixture of mundane tasks and engaging tasks. Yet, all these tasks must be completed in order to achieve the goal of order and simplicity. And this is the premise on which I am about to make the next assertion.

Within all organisations, you will find a mixture of boring and interesting tasks. I estimate the ratio to be 80% boring and 20% interesting. As mentioned earlier, all tasks, no matter how monotonous or exciting, must be completed by you and me, who constitute the organisation. And herein lies the challenge for many of us.

We enter the workplace assuming that we will be presented daily with only the interesting and engaging tasks. We enthusiastically take on projects because, at a high level, the end goal is compelling; for instance, digital transformation. However, soon we realise that to achieve this goal, we need to write code, develop policies, familiarise ourselves with existing governing standards, attend numerous meetings, manage people, and a host of other tasks that need to be done. Soon enough, as we embark on the next exciting venture, we find ourselves bored and wondering why we can’t just be confined to writing policies or auditing the code. However, all tasks must be accomplished because it is the amalgamation of these tasks that ensures order is brought into the confounding chaos and simplicity is brought into the puzzling complexity.

This is the mindset that, in my opinion, most working professionals lack. At least, it was missing for me until I recently grasped it. And it was absent for approximately 50+ people I have shared it with, either in one-on-one sessions or in a classroom setting. Once you understand this, accept it, and choose to live with it, you are halfway there to transforming how you approach work.

The “20%” is not evenly distributed 

Here’s another context to add for a balanced perspective. The “20%” is not evenly distributed. This means that although I have generalised the 80:20 split between boring and interesting tasks, not all tasks, goals, or teams would have the same split. You may look at the list I made above: 

  • Writing code, 
  • Developing policies, 
  • Reading existing governing standards, 
  • Setting up multiple meetings, 
  • Managing people

and say to yourself, “But I enjoy doing all of these except writing the code,” or “The only thing that looks interesting to me on this list is managing people.” And you would be right with your preferences. This is why it is essential to understand that the split is not even. Within some teams, it may be a split of 70% interesting and 30% boring because the team is at the heart of cutting-edge innovation for their company. Meanwhile, another team might experience a ratio of 90% boring and 10% interesting because their tasks are also pivotal to the goal of bringing order to chaos and simplicity to complexity, leaving all employees feeling drained.

Yet, even within the latter team, individual preferences and perceptions differ once more. Some individuals may see their job as 40% interesting and 60% boring. The message here is simple: the split is not as straightforward as just 80:20. Understand yourself and be fully aware of where you fall on the divide.

Action – Total You @ Work

Having the right mindset is not enough; it is merely a step towards ensuring you find fulfilment in any work. The real key to this fulfilment is anchored in the kind of action you take, based on the right mindset you have developed from reading the earlier chapter.

A few months into starting my job with my current employer, several things came together, and before I knew it, I was in a way depressed. Weeks passed by, and the feeling lingered. Mostly, the feeling of being a round peg in a square hole. Then one day, I became tired; it was the peak of it for me. “Enough!!!” I literally screamed in my flat.

That outburst allowed me to release pent-up emotions, but most importantly, I spent time with myself. I redefined what I believed the problem was, reexamined who I am, reconsidered what I cared about, evaluated my options, and determined a way forward. Without any changes in my external environment, my life changed at that moment.

A few months later, I was a shining star at work, recognised for my drive, ambition, and strong presence within the team—exactly the qualities I had identified as crucial during that episode a few months earlier. Subsequently, many opportunities came my way, and I began working on precisely the things that mattered to me. The only thing that had changed was that I had become more self-aware. I had an honest conversation with myself, took appropriate actions based on that conversation, and my experience took a 180-degree turn for the better. I brought what I have called the total me to work.

Self-Awareness

A search for the phrase “self-awareness” on Google returns 2.2 billion results in less than 1 second. I am about to contribute to that statistic because, as I journey through my professional career, it has increasingly become one of the most important ingredients that I have discovered. Until you are aware of yourself on the right level and within the right context, you will hardly ever find satisfaction in your job, and fulfilment will remain elusive.

You need to know what you care about, what truly matters to you, what keeps you awake at night and motivates you to get up first thing in the morning. If you search deeply, you will realise that it’s not just about building financial models, writing code, or crafting your organisation’s strategy. Instead, you care about your family, making the world a better place, being someone who makes others’ work easier, and putting smiles on as many people’s faces as possible, among other things. No matter what it is, I want you to understand that it matters, and you should always focus on it. There is always an opportunity for you to express yourself, but I might be getting ahead of myself here.

Once you are clear about what truly matters to you, you quickly learn that the work we do is simply a tool to help us fulfil what matters most. Let me explain.

What matters most to me? In relation to work, it’s about bringing order to chaos and simplifying complexity. In my 9-to-5 job, I am employed as a consultant, working with companies on Data Management & Strategy. If you consider all the work I do with my clients, you can sum it up as “bringing order into chaos and making simple the complex.” Yes, the immediate task might be to understand data lineage and document it, but it is also about restoring order to chaos. It is from this point that you begin to find meaning in your work, and the seed of fulfilment starts to grow. But it doesn’t end there.

Organisations are platforms of self-expression 

Obviously, I am not going to reduce this topic to a formula, and there is no doubt that the tool you have in your hand now (what you are paid to do) is not the right tool to help you express yourself. Hence, this point.

Organisations are a platform, and no matter what you care about, there is a high likelihood that you will find something within the organisation that you can contribute to (in addition to your job) to aid you in your quest. Look for it. Leverage it to increase your “20% interestingness”.

Who are you? Whatever answer you give to that answer (you can only know through self-awareness) what this point challenges you to do is to align that with your work and it also make bold to say there are often almost opportunities for that to happen. 

Outlook – Don’t be a donkey: giving your best now as an accelerant for your next step

You may have heard this story: Buridan’s donkey is standing halfway between a pile of hay and a bucket of water. It keeps looking left and right, trying to decide between hay and water. Unable to decide, it eventually dies of hunger and thirst. A donkey can’t think of the future. If it could, it would clearly realise that it could first drink the water, then go eat the hay. Don’t be a donkey. You can do everything you want to do. You just need foresight and patience.

It is understandable if all the above is still not applicable to you, and your only solution is indeed to go after that dream job. In fact, I would say that even if things were great, you should seek even better conditions. However, while doing so, don’t be a donkey. Don’t let the pursuit of what could be next rob you of the present. Drink the water well, and it will energise you to eat the food better.

In this article from 2020, I noted that “another success” is always easier after the first success.. You would have proven yourself worthy, capable, and deserving of the resources required for the next adventure once you can show a result from previous wins. Do you remember the parable of the talents? You saw how those who initially succeeded were rewarded with more resources to achieve further success. And don’t forget the one who had a lot but achieved no success; even the little they had was taken away from them.

No matter what, you need to give your best now because it will be your accelerant for the next steps. Success compounds. When you get an opportunity to be successful, grab it, no matter in what sphere that success is.

That is what I have learned about how to find fulfilment in any job you find yourself in. Please let me know your thoughts.

And remember this cautionary tale, “it’s hard to get really depressed until your dreams come true. Once your dreams come true and you realise you feel the same way you did before, then you get a feeling of hopelessness” – Rick Rubin. The feeling you crave can be achieved now. And what I have shared is how you can get it now – have the right mindset about work, take actions that foster your value, and don’t lose sight of greater potential.

Curiosity-Driven Self-Development

During my presentation last Saturday, I talked about an idea that has been one of the secret sauces of my career: Curiosity-Driven Self-Development.

In his book “How Will You Measure Your Life,” Christiansen talked about the importance of having a deliberate strategy for your career and the flexibility to embrace an emergent strategy as it becomes available. I loved the idea, and the example he shared to drive home the message was great.

Self-development traditionally aligns with the deliberate strategy for your career. For example, if you want to be a Data Scientist, you start developing your SQL skills. Or if you want to be a finance professional, you start writing your CFA exams. It’s deliberate.

To embrace the emergent strategy, though, you need another type of self-development plan—one that’s driven by curiosity. Yes, you are a Data Scientist, but you are curious about IFRS, so you start reading about it. Similarly, you are an Equity Analyst, but you are curious about Marketing, so you start delving into that. Ultimately, such practices can lead to interesting pivots in your career, as it has for me. I shared some personal stories on Saturday with my audience.

The charge is simple: careers are no longer like ladders that you have to climb but more like jungle gyms that you have to navigate. For most of us, our deliberate career strategy may not materialize due to no fault of ours but merely the universe doing its thing. To maximize our potential, we need to pursue curiosity-driven self-development.

Setting Your Own Course: Embracing “Me Metric”

At a point in life, being able to walk is the metric that matters. Then, being able to talk. Then, it quickly moved to how many exams you passed with the purpose of getting promoted. Then it was CGPA, and then it was how long it took to get your first job. Soon, it would be how long you were in a role before you got promoted. Then, it would be what level you are on.

Then, being married became a metric, and soon, the number of kids added to it. These metrics are never-ending as you progress and increase in age.

But I think we all know that already. So, let’s go a bit deeper into what might not be obvious. Until a certain point, the metrics that you prioritize and measure are (a) societal driven, (b) nature-driven, and (c) comparison-driven. “My mates are graduating with 2.1, I must have 2.1 at least also.”

“It’s about this age that I should marry,” and you have all sorts of conflicts in your mind if that time passes. “I should be earning this much now.” All these are determined by relative comparison, nature, and societal expectations. However, growth requires that we understand when to graduate from those kinds of metrics. And move on to the “Me Metrics.”

What is the “Me Metric”?

This is the kind of metric that puts YOU into context when setting the expectations for YOU. Our stories are unique, and our circumstances are different, meaning that by default, our metrics should be unique based on our circumstances.

When we move in life based on comparison, nature, and societal induced metrics, it will often lack the nuances of our circumstances, and we end up taking decisions that prioritize now over the longer term.

The “me metric” requires you to slow down, evaluate your current situation, your history, and become extremely self-aware. Your self-awareness drives the kind of expectation and ambition you set for yourself. It’s no longer “I should be this or that because my ‘mates’ are there.” It’s now “I am here because of choices I’ve made so far and the constraints that surrounded me, and I am heading there based on this timeline” (driven by you).

That’s where I want you to be. That’s where I am. And it has brought me great peace. I am inspired by all that I see around me but never envious and never feel left behind. I am me. I love where I am. And I love where I’m headed because I chose it.

Unlocking Growth: Embracing the ‘Why Not?’ Approach in Business and Career

Reading biological books is one of my favourite pastime activities. Recently, the behemoth PE company Blackstone hit $1T in AUM, reaching its ambition three years ahead. As I started to read the founder’s account in ‘What It Takes,’ I stumbled on this seminal quote that explains its growth strategy:

“The [way] we thought about building our business was to keep challenging ourselves with an open-ended question: Why not? If we came across the right person to scale a business in a great investment class, why not? If we could apply our strengths, our network, and our resources to make that business a success, why not? Other firms, we felt, defined themselves too narrowly, limiting their ability to innovate. They were advisory firms, or investment firms, or credit firms, or real estate firms. Yet they were all pursuing financial opportunities.”

In part, I was surprised this had to be said, and in another part, I can understand why it wasn’t the norm.

Why I was surprised: I have spent the last 5 years in consulting firms, moving from PwC to EY. The way I’ve observed business being done is that new ‘partners’ are admitted based on their ability to grow the business. Even more so if it were to expose the firm to a new kind of business that it was not involved in before. Essentially, asking ‘Why not?’ as long as present advantages can be leveraged to grow the new business. So I’ve always thought that was the norm.

Why I was not surprised: it’s understandable that a company would want to concentrate on their advantages, become a specialist in some niche, and do business they understand alone. That alone would be complex enough. But it appears to me that such an approach puts a lower limit on your ambition.

How is this relevant to you?

I have always maintained that the same principles that are relevant to the management of companies are equally important to the management of our careers. The most resilient career is not one that is the absolute best at programming. Rather, it is one that is the best at programming, can communicate effectively, and understands how the puzzles of business fit together. Essentially, it is one that constantly asks ‘Why not?’ Why can’t I know more? Why can’t I become more as long as they complement my existing advantages?

See here where I have written something complementary earlier.

The Real Value of Attending Events

When you attend an event, you’re not just there to listen to the speaker. The real value lies in the conversations you have with other attendees and the network you build from there.

In fact, I’d argue that listening to the speaker is overrated. Sure, you might learn a few new things, but you’re more likely to get the most out of an event by talking to other people.

Why? Because other attendees are going to be facing the same challenges as you are. They’re going to have the same questions and the same goals. And they’re going to have the same insights and the same experiences.

So when you talk to other attendees, you’re not just networking. You’re also getting access to a wealth of knowledge and experience that you can’t find anywhere else.

Of course, not all events are created equal. If you’re going to attend an event, make sure it’s one where you’re going to meet people who are like-minded and who can help you achieve your goals.

But if you do that, you’ll be amazed at how much value you can get from attending events.

Here’s an example:

Let’s say you’re an entrepreneur who’s looking to raise money for your startup. You could attend an event where Elon Musk is a speaker. You’d probably learn a few new things, but you’re more likely to make new connections that can help you raise money.

That’s because other attendees at that event are going to be investors, venture capitalists, and other people who have money to invest in startups. So if you can talk to them and build relationships with them, you’re much more likely to get the funding you need for your business.

So what’s the takeaway?

The next time you’re thinking about attending an event, don’t just focus on the speaker. Focus on the attendees. Because those are the people who are going to help you get the most out of the event.

Focus on what matters.

Attending events is a great way to learn new things, network with other professionals, and stay up-to-date on the latest trends in your industry. But if you want to get the most out of your event experience, focus on the people you meet, not just the speakers.

I hope this helps!

What are your thoughts on this?
Do you agree that the real value of attending events is in the attendees? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Why I Write

I think the real title should be a few reasons why I write. But don’t worry about that, let’s just get into this.

  1. I write primarily because something lingers in my mind and craves expression. I don’t often have the right words before I start to write that usually comes as I face the blank sheet. But the idea is usually there and they linger on my mind enough for me to say I would write about them.
  2. I write to be in the face of my network. I put a lot of value in the network that I have built and that I have around me. Writing is one of the easiest ways for me to stay in touch. I can’t all nor can I even “know” all. However, whenever I write and my writing gets to their notice, they are reminded of me and it gives them the impression that they are still in contact with me and in truth they are. Occasionally, they like my post and often add a comment. In such instances, I confirm that they are still with me and I can also reply to them in the case of a comment. In most cases, that is usually enough to keep in contact with my network.
  3. I write to expand my network. When. I was in Lagos, it’s commonplace for me to enter a place for the first time and I would find a few who would say “Oh, you are ‘the’ David Alade”. One day in London someone also said that. And they spoke with me as if they knew me already and indeed, they do. More than anything else in my life, writing has helped me the most to build my network. And as I mentioned above, it has also been my instrument to keep in contact. 
  4. I write because I hope people find what I write about useful. I have been immensely helped by the writing of others. Sometimes I wonder what my life would be like if I’d not read some things. And since I have the ability and wherewithal to write, it places a responsibility on me to write as well. And I’m immensely grateful for the number of people that my writing has helped as well. 

I considered writing this article imperative because, by my definition of writing, I’ve taken a break from writing in a while. And as I claw back out of my shell, I find myself genuinely asking the question “Why do you write?” Also, in the past week, I’ve shared my number 2 reason with people and I’d not realised it was one of my reasons until I did. 

Here is the thing, I think I might keep this page alive on my blog and keep on updating it as I settle on more reasons why I write. For now, those are the 4 that I would like to highlight. 

« Older posts

© 2025 David Alade

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑