A place where I organise the chaos of my mind

Category: Articles (Page 10 of 14)

The Real Labour of Thinking

“There is no expedient to which a man will not resort to avoid the real labour of thinking.” – Robert Beno Cialdini

That’s the quote that has got me thinking since yesterday.

So there’s a labour of thinking?

And human will go to all extent to avoid that labour.

Why?

When was last time you think?

Not thought about what you will eat tomorrow. Thoughts like

What’s the universe made of?

Why would human go to any extent to avoid the labour of thinking?

Why do good things happen to bad people and bad things happen to good people?

Why is it that 2 humans raised under the same condition will grow up to be opposite of each other in all things?

Why is it that things left on their own move from orderliness to disorderliness?

When was the last time you took a question and spend weeks or months thinking about it?

There’s a real labour of thinking and there is no expedient to which a man will not resort to avoid it.

I’ve been thinking about that since yesterday.

Writing Aids Understanding

Many times we encounter knowledge that is alien to our brain, hence, difficult to understand. In this article, I shared how writing has helped me in understanding such alien knowledge.

Have you read an article or a book before and can’t seem to make sense of it because you couldn’t understand what the article or book was saying? Well I’ve a lot of times.

Recently, I read another one of such article “The Universe May Be Conscious, Says Prominent Scientist”. I’ve never given consciousness a thought before that day and neither did it cross my mind to think of the universe as a conscious entity. So I struggled with fully grasping the full picture of the article.

But since I am always interested in new things, and I’ve learned a couple of things about how to learn, I chose to experiment with something new, writing down my understanding of the article. Following is what I wrote about conciousness and the universe.


The article wass about quantum physics but of course it had to pick lessons from religion and neuroscience. I didn’t understand the article but I wondered how this is the mystery some people spend their life on to uncover.

Of course, some others have been preoccupied with such quest in the past as well, and the benefit of their quest is what became our world today.

God is a scientist and seeing Him from such prism has only helped me to appreciate what marvel He is more.

He wrapped up all the secret of the world under science and wants us to uncover them.

The glory of God is to hide things and our glory is to unhide them. Science alone has helped us over the Millennia to reveal our glory.

When I said science, I do not just mean Physics and Chemistry but all things in the human endeavour that lends itself to scientific process.

Including Sociology, Philosophy and many things that unhide mysteries.

Now, about the article I do not fully understand, conciousness was the central point of the article. And the subject of conciousness is important owing to the vast implication that it has.

To start with, there’s no single unifying theory yet that can explain where conciousness comes from. Prominent explanations come from Materialism, Mind-Body dualism and Panpsychism. They all offer explanations of the origin of consiousness with varying limitations.

But what is consciousness?

I think it’s best seen as awareness. In Buddhism for instance, consciousness is the only thing that exists.

Zen koan is famous for asking “If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?” One must come to the realization that everything we experience is filtered through and interpreted by our mind. Without it, the universe doesn’t exist at all or at least, not without some sort of consciousness observing it.

Will the universe exist if we are not aware of it? Did the tree make a sound if there’s no ear to hear the sound? It explains why Bhudism is of the opinion that conciousness is the only thing that exists. But where conciousness comes from, no one knows yet.

However, knowing it might get us closer to building an Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Our computers today are brilliant than us but they are not concious of their existence. How they can become concious remains a puzzle.

Obviously, you need to separate intelligence from consiousness as the machine analogy stated above made clear. Robots are intelligent, and our programs are only getting ever more intelligent but they aren’t concious (yet).

When OpenAI released GPT-3 two months ago, it took the world by storm with its level of intelligence but no one could care about weather it’s awareness of its environment. Those are things outside of their current realm. But how can we crack this and what will it mean if indeed the universe is concious? Can we build conciousness out of materials?


After writing that as my understanding of the article, I must confess my understanding of the subject of discuss increased. The reason for that is not far fetched, the art of writing is the art of thinking, writing forces you to make connections out of the seemingly unconnected, it forces you to think about process and compels you to find answers to some questions you didn’t know you have but we’re revealed during the writing process.

Take for instance, when I was writing that summary, I got to the point where I asked myslef what exactly is conciousness? I defined it as awareness in my mind but unconvinced, I did a quick Google search and it was confirmed. Now I can confidently affirm my definitionof conciousness. The brsins learns that and it gives it room to create more connection between the familar and unfamiliar.

If I didn’t write down my understanding of the article, it can almost be guaranteed that I won’t remember anything about the article today. But writing it down probably means I won’t forget about it ever again.


There are a lot of advantages to writing and the above is just a tip of an iceberg. Next time when you confront something difficult to understand, read it well and d try to writedown your understanding of such a thing. You will notice that what you understand from it will be clear and what you don’t will spring up as questions which you can now further investigate.

Cheers to taking up that habit.

Have you shared this newsletter with someone before? You should already. Thank you.

Developing A Mind Without Boundary

We were thought to think with boundaries, yet the world as we have it and the kind of problems we will face are not aware of any boundaries.

“Reality does not divide itself into disciplines – physics, biology, psychology…Disciplines are a human endeavour to divide reality into bite-sized, digestible chunks. Experience has no boundaries. It creates value by connecting the dots to understand reality.”

– Reading guru

When we began acquiring knowledge as beings (Homo Sapiens), we didn’t start out thinking of ourselves as a Software Engineer or an Artist or an Accountant. We started by recognizing a problem and devising a means to solve them.

The means to the solution may cut across many divides that we create today in terms of Engineering, Design, Art and so on but it doesn’t matter then (nor now). What mattered then was solving problems. It’s of no importance if you are a Mathematician or an Accountant, you combined all skills necessary to get the problem solved. That’s reality, that’s the world we still live in. A world where our problems are agnostics of our discipline or course of study at the University, a world where we are daily confronted with wicked problems than need to be fixed somehow.

Industrial revolution, civilization and advancement in technology brought about the need to create disciplines, our attempt at dividing reality into some bit-sized digestible doze. But the reality hasn’t changed and still requires a mind without boundary to masterfully navigate it and solve it’s wicked problems.

It also true that we have so much developed in knowledge as a being that it will be impossible for one person to absorb perfect knowledge from all disciplines or become an expert in all disciplines. That will just be too much for a person to absorb.

How then can we develop a mind without boundary to solve wicked problems that our one boundaried mind can’t solve?

The best way to this was an advise given by Chalie Munger in his 2007 address at USC.

Charlie Munger:

If you generalize Cicero as I think one should, there are all these other things that you should know in addition to history, and those other things are the big ideas in all the other disciplines. And it doesn’t help you just to know them enough just so you can prattle them back on an exam and get an A. You have to learn these things in such a way that they’re in a mental latticework in your head and you automatically use them for the rest of your life.

If you do that, I solemnly promise you that one day you’ll be walking down the street and look to your right and left and think, “My heavenly days! I’m now one of the few most competent people of my whole age forward.” If you don’t do it, many of the brightest of you will live in the middle ranks or in the shallows.

Charlie’s solution for the challenge before us is simple. Agreed, you can’t sit down to study all disciplines in the world as we have them now, there is just not enough time for that. In fact, when you look at all those disciplines, not everything that they have to offer are needed or necessary to masterfully navigate the world. So he proposed we study the big ideas of all disciplines, add them to our mental latticework and automatically use them for the rest our life.

This I’ve been doing in a very long while as I continually try to build a mind without boundary.

In future posts, I will be taking these big ideas one after the other to explain how they can help us build a mind without boundary, make better decisions and navigate life masterfully.

Comment below if you are excited to learn how to build a mind without boundary.

It’s Not Always Winning

Life is full ups and downs, but the Instagram culture that has taken this world by storm will have us believe it’s always about winning because winning is the only thing that makes it to instagram.

Here’s a part of my story you don’t hear often but it’s always great to hear them.

Everyday and when I say everyday, I mean everyday, I struggle to get my work done. I wake up sometimes thinking “must I work today,” other times, I open my laptop and stare at my laptop a whole day without getting anything done. You see me write a lot, but I also struggle with writing every now and then. Yes, I write with joy but it doesn’t reduce the uneasiness that comes with it.

Sometimes I wonder if what I’m doing has meaning at all. Other times I wonder if it will amount to anything. It’s a daily struggle here and there.

Sometimes I feel like I’m winning, sometimes like I’m losing, other times, I can’t even tell what I’m feeling.

But that only makes me human. It’s never always winning for anyone, it’s just about what we talk about. And we say the good ones more.

I can go on listing all the struggles… but I should stop already, my message should be clear, it’s never a straight line of winning.


A tendency when we hear about other people’s struggles is to wish the tables were turned and you take on there’s while you let go of yours. But that’s not the way to progress in life. You see the Bible was right when it says “we all have the capacity to handle our struggles.” Anecdotal evidence supports this as well. Think about your struggles of 10 weeks ago, can you even remember them? Almost no.

What you want to optimize for at every point of your life is that when you look back, it should be clear that you’ve been progressing.

Image by @visualizevalue

Days are designed to be chaotic and there’s nothing you can do to stop that. The same day that you feel hyper happy you can reach your deepest low on those days. But if I may ask you again the lows you were feeling 10 weeks ago, what about them now? Forgotten.

Make sure you don’t do anything funny during your low periods. Just cope with them. Yes, cope with them because you can’t wish them away. You are blessed if you have a shoulder (parent, wife, husband, friend, girlfriend or boyfriend etc) to lean on when you feel those lows.

It makes us human. Yes the ups and downs is a good reminder of our humanity.


Here’s what I’ve learned as well, embracing realities of life like this helps us to cope with than denying them.

My understanding of nature is that “it is best conquered when we align with it. Don’t fight it.” Embracing your lows is a difficult one, but it’s a good response to it.

Here’s another thing that I noticed. Many times, what brings us to those lows are our perception of reality not reality itself. Reality is objective, it brings no one down or lift anyone up. It’s just there. Our perception of it determines what we feel. And our perception is in our control but we can’t also over control it. Life isn’t balance.

Perception of reality

Recently, I did a work, I wasn’t sure what to make of the work so I was feeling low (the work itself is objective remember, my perception was brought me low). It turns out the work was great as it well received by the client. However, my period of feeling low has pushed me to do deatiled and well researched work on another project.

You see why we can’t over control our perception now. Some times those perceptions that makes us feel low push us towards excellence and breakthrough.

The best we can do is accept being human and embrace our humanity. We can’t over optimize it.

If you are in a position where you feel low currently, I’m telling you that it’s fine we all feel it. The best among us those, you might not just see it. Don’t wish it away (wishing away is our default response but it never works, I know because I’ve done it), but let it lead you to a path where your life must go. Embrace your humanity and you tend to be fine in the long enough time.

Have a great week starting.

Working To Stop Being Your Enemy

We do things that are contrary to what we set out to do, more often than we care to observe. That makes us our enemies. But how can we put a stop to that or minimize it?

Yesterday’s article “You Are Your Enemy” seeks to uncover hidden conditioning that are meant to keep us from doing what we most desire to do and it was enlightening. The next question that follows revelation is “how can we change the narrative.” It’s not enough to point out a problem if we can’t search for the answer.

I must start by saying I don’t have a definite answer to this question. The fact that I pointed them out intellectually doesn’t mean I’m immune to the conditioning. I just live everyday with the understanding that “I am my enemy” and I try to minimize the effect of that.

That said, I found a thought provoking probable solution to this. It was something from Jim Oshaughnessy. Here’s what he has to say:

I think knowing something “intellectually” offers little help with our ability to truly understand our many failings and build systems and processes for minimizing their impact on us. The power of emotions, the power of narratives, and the power of self-deception are exponentially more powerful than a dispassionate and longer-term view and almost always win.

An ounce of emotions equals a pound of facts. To truly break free is both hard and frightening. We risk being ostracized and labeled heretics and apostates.

The only person who can change you is you. If you want to truly succeed at virtually any aspect of life, you must begin to dig deep on all your beliefs and assumptions. You must challenge each one, no matter how basic. When we look at history, we see that most beliefs and commonly accepted “truths” were, in fact, wrong. Why should we be any different?

Looking at life as a series of probabilities as opposed to absolutes allows you to discard beliefs that are no longer useful and adopt new ones that are. Always aim to go further.

All emphasis mine

Jim’s words are profound at helping us find a solution to our innate problems. And I like the beginning of that. He made it clear that “intellectual knowledge of our problems is not enough to help us solve it, we must do more.” That explains why I still struggle with being my enemy despite intellectual awareness. But here’s what I noticed, intellectual awareness can give you the illusion of a solution, don’t fall for it.

He also said one thing that strikes me, “seeking a solution will place you on a part where you risk being labeled heretics and apostates.” I’ve had a share of this is the reason why it strikes me as a thoughtful observation. You see, to allow yourself for example hold on to a stock when everyone is selling will put you in an awkward position, to take a sleep of 8 hours a day when folks around you take pride in 4 hours sleep per week won’t make you their favourite. All attempts to optimize against your natural tendencies puts you in a position where labeling is easy.

But the only person who can change you is you. Just you. And that requires some guts and hard work and contrarian spirit. By Jim’s explanation, it includes having to “question your beliefs and reexamining them,” it ends on seeing life as a series of probabilities and not some absolutes.

Why do you take pride in 4 hours sleep per week?

Why did you buy the stock?

What’s stopping you from fixing the friction in your relationship?

Answering all these questions and all others that may have subjected you to your natural tendencies will get you close to your beliefs and provide you an opportunity to reexamine them. Ultimately, triumph comes when you see probabilities in life more than you see absolutes. That must not go without saying, there are no absolute fix as well, you must keep working.

My Evolving Definition of Success

We all try hard in life to attain “success”. But what is success? More money in the account, more time with family or both? And how can we achieve both without sacrificing the other?

This is a personal struggle and I believe it’s more integral in human society than we might like to admit. We all struggle to find a definition for success. At one point success is money made, at another point it is the number of people you influenced, at one point it is winning a 100-meter race at another point it is raising kids whom you are proud of. The definition is fluid.

I have also struggled with the question for years. About 4 years ago I stumbled on a TED Talk by John Wooden (The Difference Between Winning and Succeeding), that day and over the period of meditating on it, my definition of success had changed. John used a profound story to wrap up what to him would be termed as a success.

“At God’s footstool to confess, a poor soul knelt and bowed his head. ‘I failed!’ he cried. The Master said, ‘Thou didst thy best, that is success.”

From that day on, I adopted this definition of success for myself. If I had given it my best, the outcome of my best will not determine my success, my best alone is enough. The ensuing months, and years have been profound. But here I am again evolving in my definition of success.

The Evolution

Two things have lingered for so long in my heart.

One, at the point of death, I’ve heard different stories of people having a rethink about their life and redefining the very fabrics upon which they’ve lived there while life. The get to there death bed and all that they have erstwhile defined as success begins to change. It is no longer the number of gold medals nor is it the number of applause. In fact, not the amount of dollar in the bank account. All of which Clayton Christensen referred to as “summary statistics”. They are basically thinking about what success is to them. But as all will admit, it is usually too late for the majority by the time they start to reconsider.

This year started with me reading the book “AI Superpowers” by Kai-Fu Lee (a respected fellow in the field of AI)

My goal of picking up the book is definitely not to learn something about success as is to learn about the future of AI and the power play between Silicon Valley and China. But as life would have it, Kai-Fu Lee happened to have been close to death as well and like all who came close to this, he needed to redefine success and ask the question what really matters? What really counts? Seeing that is where the real definition of success begins.

Before his near-death experience, he has lived his life as an “optimization machine”. Simply put, as an optimization machine, he gave his best and went extra mile for the things that qualify to fall under “summary statistics” while giving the minimum possible to things that can not be quantified but yet required his attention (this principally includes time with family).

The result, he had a stellar career that took him from Microsoft to Google and later as a Venture Capitalist leading the new wave of venture funding in China. He was obviously a role model for all ambitious Chinese youths. That wasn’t just all, he also built a beautiful family who loves him, cares for him and which got the minimum possible of his time just to ensure all dimensions of his life are optimized.

Beautiful result! You said. I also believed that.

I believed it until he went on to tell stories of regret about how what he had optimized his life for so far isn’t what he would call success. The summary statistics weren’t enough.

He wished he had spent more time with family, love more, be useful more to humanity in a new dimension that summary statistics can’t understand.

But that’s was not all about it. After reading this part of Kai-Fu’s story, I asked myself, how would I live my own life? What will I optimize for? What will I define success as?

I was selfish and maybe hard-hearted.

I told myself, I would rather also have my story like that of Kai-Fu. Optimize the early stage for “summary statistics”, then learn later in life that that is not what matters then make a pivot. By then, I thought money will be plenty, medals countless and stories to tell.

Don’t blame me so much for thinking that way. Remember I said at the beginning that I have read a lot of similar stories like his.

First, optimize for summary statistics, then come close to death and realize that it was all not a right optimization then make a pivot to the right lane. That way, you benefit from both worlds.

I literally thought that was the only way to benefit from both worlds.

But I was wrong again.

All through life, defining success for what it really is has been a concern. And many times when we think about it, money comes to mind seeing it is on of the few things (summary statistics) that can quickly tell if our effort is producing value and proffer perception (illusion) of success.

While it’s absolutely good and one should chase it, it turns out that it is never enough and in fact, if its pairs were mutually exclusive, giving it up over other things that can not be explained by summary statistics is always the best bet. And this brings me to my second part of the two things that have lingered in my heart.

I had an epiphany and a coming together of different bodies of knowledge when I heard of Clayton’s death. The many testimonies about this 6’8 tall man reinforced my epiphany.

But before the epiphany, let me pick from where I stopped on the first narrative.

Why did I think of going the normal route as all I’ve read of – the route of optimising first for summary statistics and then making a pivot upon realization of the wrong optimization? 

https://twitter.com/DavidAlade__/status/1211984695791149057?s=20

For a simple and not counter-intuitive reason. I thought the pursuit of summary statistics and other things unexplainable by summary statistics are mutually exclusive. The pursuit of one means letting go of the other.

And I thought that way because all stories I’ve read seems to be that way.

The ones who optimized for summary statistics tend to give up on other experiences and the ones who chose other experiences gave up significantly on summary statistics.

However, I wanted both.

So the way I could see that happening was to follow the footsteps of those that I see ahead. Do one first then, follow the other later in life.

The death of Clayton brought a rather paradigm-changing epiphany.

“You could pursue both concurrently was what Clayton’s life preached to me. I could see it more obviously from testimonies about him, books he wrote, articles he wrote and lectures that he gave.”

Clayton faced a similar dilemma as I did and his faith in God above all else saw him through and I believe it was so in order for him to be a living testimony.

He also discovered quickly by the virtue of his work that all we face is the “dilemma of resource allocation” in the face of conflicting interests. Learning to appropriately allocate that resource (time) between those things that can be explained by summary statistics and those that cannot is our goal.

Another thing he quickly learned as well was that those things that cannot be explained by summary statistics are weighing more in gold than the counterpart. Realising this made him allocate his resources optimally for all interests of his.

He practically lived his life as a beacon of light to all around him and beyond including me whom he never met until he died.

These two events or call it worldview have come to shape my new definition of success.

My New Definition of Success

“Success to me now is a moment thing. It is fluid and not static. It evolves but predictable. It is mostly wrapped on the moments when I contribute to another person’s betterment and upliftment. Success is gotten not just from me exclusively but from my interaction with the world around me. How I have better and extend its life.”

And if I must introduce a summary statistics to my view of success, it must be one that is hinged on output instead of input.

Output: how much have I given to those who in my wildest dream I cannot except them to repay me? How many hours of my time have I sacrificially given to make someone else better and develop? How many did I point to the way of God?

Input: how much did I make in an hour? How many gold medals did I win? How many hours did I spend studying for the next exam that will help get a promotion?

Output not input is the way about my new view of success.

https://twitter.com/DavidAlade__/status/1221447311747883009?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1221447311747883009%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidalade.com%2Fmy-evolving-definition-of-success%2F

I have chosen to still bring in the concept of summary statistics because I understand the fundamental human craving for statistics. Our brain is really wired to value these summary statistics.

What will not be allowed is for the wrong summary statistics to find its way into the new paradigm.

But why does it matter that we get our definition of success right?

I think the reason should have been apparent from foregoing. But I will take time to spell it out.

It’s important that we define success for ourselves so that we can optimize for the most efficient and rewarding thing early on.

I am fond of asking the question…

What are you optimizing for?

Except you define success for yourself, you might find it hard, really hard optimizing for what really matters to you.

Defining success then gives you focus, a sense of purpose and sets you ablaze to pursue hard after what matters to you.

That is why I have taken it upon myself to define success in a very personal way. Because it is my life.

Finally but not finally

I started by telling you the story of how we all search for a definition, John Wooden for me gave the best definition I have found until that time. Now I have developed my own definition by connecting different dots. Does that mean I am discarding my earlier definition of success which is “giving one’s best to a course and taking that as a success instead of the outcome of such course?”

No, I have not and will not. There is an intersection between both, one definition is about giving your best, the other is about service to others. What I have learnt is that service to others can be a lot of work, sometimes you even get badly rewarded for doing so. But that is where the intersection lies, not the outcome of the course but you giving your best to the course. The course in this scenario being service to others.

What my new definition of success has then allowed me to do is to be more focused optimizing for the right metrics in my life as a new way of viewing success.

You Are Your Enemy

Our natural conditioning subjects us to a lifestyle where what’s most convenient for us to do are things we don’t want to do.

One of the very important lessons I learnt from Cognitive Science is that “I am my enemy and you are your enemy as well”

An enemy is someone who opposes you, harms you or weakens you

It’s really interesting to learn that’s exactly what we do to ourselves. Let’s consider a few example.

I know doing “this and that” will take me to the next income level that I desire but I don’t do what’s necessary. Am I not harming myself myself that way?

I know that changing “that thing” will stop the friction in my relationship but I won’t change still. Am I not in fierce opposition against myself?

I know that 10 minutes of daily meditation will give me good mental health but still I won’t do it. What can we call that sort of opposition where doing what’s best for me is not what I do?

I know sleeping for 8 hours a day will improve my health and help me live longer but I take pride in posting on social media that I’ve only slept 4 hours in the past week.

Am I not my enemy?

I know that not spending that money but investing it will help me build wealth habit but I still spent it.

I know that the stock will most likely do good given time but I will still sell it at a loss.

Definitely, I am my enemy and you are your enemy.

A very good question will be what then can we do salvage the situation? Look out for what I will be sharing tomorrow where I will try and find a solution to our natural conditioning and optimize against the condition that positions us as our own enemies.

Grey Is The Color You Are Looking For

We try a lot to judge things from the prism of black and white but does anything under the green planet qualify for such prism?

Human misjudgment is a concept that grabbed my attention since I learnt about it from Charlie Munger.

The idea of misjudgment is simple, because of our psychological and cognitive conditioning as human, we tend to falter at the point of decision making (usually requires judgement).

One mental model to arm yourself with to deal with such conditioning is what I want to share with you today.

The default state of our mind when confronted with situations is usually to categorize them under the two prisms: Good or bad, righteous or evil, white or black and so on. It’s easier for the brain to understand things like that than for your to tell it Grey. Did you notice there’s a part of your brain that still tend to see grey as black?

The reason for this is not far fetched, thousands of years ago while we were still in our primitive state as hunter-gatherer and our brain was developing, the prevailing conditions of that time requires such judgement.

The lion will kill you or you run away (no room for grey – maybe the lion’s teeth has been removed that’s why it can walk around in the neighborhood).

You either eat now or you go hungry (no room for grey – there was no way to preserve the foods)

The oncoming man is either from my tribe or against my tribe (no room for grey – maybe he missed his roads. Times when such grey was entertained, it didn’t end well.)

Those were the kind of conditions under which the brain was developed. So it has become accustomed to such prism of judgment for decision making. And it took a lot for the brain to develop to it’s current state so it won’t just adjust to a new reality overnight.

But you need to conciously move away from such a worldview. Many things in life will qualify for a grey definition than black and white could ever have.

So the next time you are confronted with the need to pass a judgement, take a pause from concluding black or white. Let your first assumption be grey. Seeing grey gives you room to be able to consider things from an unbiased mind.

If you’ve judge white, it becomes difficult to change it to black. If you’ve judged black, even more difficult to change it to white. But if your initial condition is grey, you give yourself room to consider all available data objectively and to make an informed conclusion later on.

From Orderliness to Disorderliness

The way of the world and how you can use that to your advantage

Entropy is a concept in Physics that explains the natural state of the world.

It teaches that in a state of nature, things move from orderliness to disorderliness or disorderliness to more disorderliness.

What I’ve observed and experienced in life is that everything lends itself to that principle.

If you leave your career to the state of nature, it will slop downward

If you leave you business to a state of nature, it will slop downward

If you leave your health to the state of nature, it will slop downward

The entropy observation permeates everything about the universe.

To reverse that, you need to constantly be in action, in action against the state of nature. It means you take your career to your hands, it means you setup processes for your businessand it means you are deliberate about your health (what you eat and don’t eat, the time you sleep and wake up).

Doing Hard Things

Your only best bet to getting what you want from life

I wrote an article once. The central idea of the article was that “you won’t get what you want or what you are after because you aren’t going to do the work it requires to get it.”

That’s still very much valid.

Don’t say this or that is what you can do or can’t do until you’ve actually done it and gave it your best while doing.

If there’s a thing that almost all people run away from because it’s hard, then you will put yourself in a place of great advantage if you run towards such.

The reverse is also true, the more people run towards a thing, the lesser the value you will derive from joining the bandwagon. Or you may have to do the extraordinary to make any difference.

God played the fat tail risk hedge you should as well. He did when He was distributing talents to his workers. About the guy He gave just one talent, He had estimated that if the guy could use it well, it might return 10x or more. And of course, since he didn’t use it well, God reallocated His capital.

You should also play that game. Take a skill that is hard to grasp and it might be what will give you the 10x return. If you fail to grasp it, what you learnt while doing something hard will never go to waste. And if you are able to learn, 10x return may await you. You are ready better of doing something hard than doing the easy things.

What a lot of you don’t understand is that doing seemingly hard things have rewards that are asymmetric. That is, little effort can bring you rewards beyond measure.

That’s counter-intuitive in a way. Very few people in the world are doing the hard things, so society attaches more value to your little effort than you may even attach yourself.

On the contrary, doing the easy things doesn’t confer much value, and it doesn’t matter how much time you spent to do the easy thing. It’s not just so valuable to the society because they can get 100 other people who can do same.

To get more value from easy things, you will have to do it in an uncommon way, but that too is already entering the realm of hard things (hard things can also easy done in an extraordinary way). Those who seek ease aren’t that much on the side of favor with the society.

Another thing that adds value to both hard and easy things is “skin in the game”

I’ve been there is much more valuable than I read about “there.”

I’ve done it is also more important than I’ve seen someone done it.


Another concept of value I stumbled on is what Andrew Chen called “having a thing”

Having a thing confers more value perception than not having a thing.

Having a thing is about having something you are building, accompanied by proper documentation.

We all seek financial independence and that doesn’t come without a certain level of money. However, money is only a representation of value and except you offer value to the society, you are far from financial independence.

Ask yourself, what value can I add to this so and so individual or company if I met them or work for them.

If you have nothing that can come out of you (independent of a body-coporate) that another person is wiling to pay for, you have work to do.

From where this started, I will say again, you won’t get all you want because you won’t do all that’s required to get it. And more often than not, it usually requires doing hard things.


Here are 3 things I learnt from in the past week:

  • The act of looking at something changes it – an effect that holds true for people, animals, even atoms. Here’s how the observer effect distorts our world and how we can get a more accurate picture. – The Observer Effect: Seeing Is Changing

  • On Game Theory – What makes it possible for cooperation to emerge is the knowledge between the players that they may meet again. They are not playing a single game, but an integrated one. This means that the choices today not only determine the outcome of this move but can influence the later choices of the players. – Tit for Tat and The Evolution of Cooperation

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 David Alade

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑